7Network Working Group D. Crocker, Ed.
8Request for Comments: 5234 Brandenburg InternetWorking
10Obsoletes: 4234 THUS plc.
11Category: Standards Track January 2008
14 Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF
18 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
19 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
20 improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
21 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
22 and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
26 Internet technical specifications often need to define a formal
27 syntax. Over the years, a modified version of Backus-Naur Form
28 (BNF), called Augmented BNF (ABNF), has been popular among many
29 Internet specifications. The current specification documents ABNF.
30 It balances compactness and simplicity with reasonable
31 representational power. The differences between standard BNF and
32 ABNF involve naming rules, repetition, alternatives, order-
33 independence, and value ranges. This specification also supplies
34 additional rule definitions and encoding for a core lexical analyzer
35 of the type common to several Internet specifications.
58Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 1]
60RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
65 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
66 2. Rule Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
67 2.1. Rule Naming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
68 2.2. Rule Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
69 2.3. Terminal Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
70 2.4. External Encodings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
71 3. Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
72 3.1. Concatenation: Rule1 Rule2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
73 3.2. Alternatives: Rule1 / Rule2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
74 3.3. Incremental Alternatives: Rule1 =/ Rule2 . . . . . . . . . 7
75 3.4. Value Range Alternatives: %c##-## . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
76 3.5. Sequence Group: (Rule1 Rule2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
77 3.6. Variable Repetition: *Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
78 3.7. Specific Repetition: nRule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
79 3.8. Optional Sequence: [RULE] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
80 3.9. Comment: ; Comment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
81 3.10. Operator Precedence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
82 4. ABNF Definition of ABNF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
83 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
84 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
85 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
86 6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
87 Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
88 Appendix B. Core ABNF of ABNF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
89 B.1. Core Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
90 B.2. Common Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
114Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 2]
116RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
121 Internet technical specifications often need to define a formal
122 syntax and are free to employ whatever notation their authors deem
123 useful. Over the years, a modified version of Backus-Naur Form
124 (BNF), called Augmented BNF (ABNF), has been popular among many
125 Internet specifications. It balances compactness and simplicity with
126 reasonable representational power. In the early days of the Arpanet,
127 each specification contained its own definition of ABNF. This
128 included the email specifications, [RFC733] and then [RFC822], which
129 came to be the common citations for defining ABNF. The current
130 document separates those definitions to permit selective reference.
131 Predictably, it also provides some modifications and enhancements.
133 The differences between standard BNF and ABNF involve naming rules,
134 repetition, alternatives, order-independence, and value ranges.
135 Appendix B supplies rule definitions and encoding for a core lexical
136 analyzer of the type common to several Internet specifications. It
137 is provided as a convenience and is otherwise separate from the meta
138 language defined in the body of this document, and separate from its
145 The name of a rule is simply the name itself, that is, a sequence of
146 characters, beginning with an alphabetic character, and followed by a
147 combination of alphabetics, digits, and hyphens (dashes).
151 Rule names are case insensitive.
153 The names <rulename>, <Rulename>, <RULENAME>, and <rUlENamE> all
154 refer to the same rule.
156 Unlike original BNF, angle brackets ("<", ">") are not required.
157 However, angle brackets may be used around a rule name whenever their
158 presence facilitates in discerning the use of a rule name. This is
159 typically restricted to rule name references in free-form prose, or
160 to distinguish partial rules that combine into a string not separated
161 by white space, such as shown in the discussion about repetition,
170Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 3]
172RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
177 A rule is defined by the following sequence:
181 where <name> is the name of the rule, <elements> is one or more rule
182 names or terminal specifications, and <crlf> is the end-of-line
183 indicator (carriage return followed by line feed). The equal sign
184 separates the name from the definition of the rule. The elements
185 form a sequence of one or more rule names and/or value definitions,
186 combined according to the various operators defined in this document,
187 such as alternative and repetition.
189 For visual ease, rule definitions are left aligned. When a rule
190 requires multiple lines, the continuation lines are indented. The
191 left alignment and indentation are relative to the first lines of the
192 ABNF rules and need not match the left margin of the document.
196 Rules resolve into a string of terminal values, sometimes called
197 characters. In ABNF, a character is merely a non-negative integer.
198 In certain contexts, a specific mapping (encoding) of values into a
199 character set (such as ASCII) will be specified.
201 Terminals are specified by one or more numeric characters, with the
202 base interpretation of those characters indicated explicitly. The
203 following bases are currently defined:
217 respectively specify the decimal and hexadecimal representation of
218 [US-ASCII] for carriage return.
226Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 4]
228RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
231 A concatenated string of such values is specified compactly, using a
232 period (".") to indicate a separation of characters within that
237 ABNF permits the specification of literal text strings directly,
238 enclosed in quotation marks. Hence:
240 command = "command string"
242 Literal text strings are interpreted as a concatenated set of
243 printable characters.
247 ABNF strings are case insensitive and the character set for these
258 will match "abc", "Abc", "aBc", "abC", "ABc", "aBC", "AbC", and
261 To specify a rule that is case sensitive, specify the characters
266 rulename = %d97 %d98 %d99
270 rulename = %d97.98.99
272 will match only the string that comprises only the lowercase
282Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 5]
284RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
2872.4. External Encodings
289 External representations of terminal value characters will vary
290 according to constraints in the storage or transmission environment.
291 Hence, the same ABNF-based grammar may have multiple external
292 encodings, such as one for a 7-bit US-ASCII environment, another for
293 a binary octet environment, and still a different one when 16-bit
294 Unicode is used. Encoding details are beyond the scope of ABNF,
295 although Appendix B provides definitions for a 7-bit US-ASCII
296 environment as has been common to much of the Internet.
298 By separating external encoding from the syntax, it is intended that
299 alternate encoding environments can be used for the same syntax.
3033.1. Concatenation: Rule1 Rule2
305 A rule can define a simple, ordered string of values (i.e., a
306 concatenation of contiguous characters) by listing a sequence of rule
315 So that the rule <mumble> matches the lowercase string "aba".
317 Linear white space: Concatenation is at the core of the ABNF parsing
318 model. A string of contiguous characters (values) is parsed
319 according to the rules defined in ABNF. For Internet specifications,
320 there is some history of permitting linear white space (space and
321 horizontal tab) to be freely and implicitly interspersed around major
322 constructs, such as delimiting special characters or atomic strings.
326 This specification for ABNF does not provide for implicit
327 specification of linear white space.
329 Any grammar that wishes to permit linear white space around
330 delimiters or string segments must specify it explicitly. It is
331 often useful to provide for such white space in "core" rules that are
332 then used variously among higher-level rules. The "core" rules might
333 be formed into a lexical analyzer or simply be part of the main
338Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 6]
340RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
3433.2. Alternatives: Rule1 / Rule2
345 Elements separated by a forward slash ("/") are alternatives.
350 will accept <foo> or <bar>.
354 A quoted string containing alphabetic characters is a special form
355 for specifying alternative characters and is interpreted as a non-
356 terminal representing the set of combinatorial strings with the
357 contained characters, in the specified order but with any mixture
358 of upper- and lowercase.
3603.3. Incremental Alternatives: Rule1 =/ Rule2
362 It is sometimes convenient to specify a list of alternatives in
363 fragments. That is, an initial rule may match one or more
364 alternatives, with later rule definitions adding to the set of
365 alternatives. This is particularly useful for otherwise independent
366 specifications that derive from the same parent ruleset, such as
367 often occurs with parameter lists. ABNF permits this incremental
368 definition through the construct:
370 oldrule =/ additional-alternatives
374 ruleset = alt1 / alt2
378 ruleset =/ alt4 / alt5
380 is the same as specifying
382 ruleset = alt1 / alt2 / alt3 / alt4 / alt5
394Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 7]
396RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
3993.4. Value Range Alternatives: %c##-##
401 A range of alternative numeric values can be specified compactly,
402 using a dash ("-") to indicate the range of alternative values.
409 DIGIT = "0" / "1" / "2" / "3" / "4" / "5" / "6" /
413 Concatenated numeric values and numeric value ranges cannot be
414 specified in the same string. A numeric value may use the dotted
415 notation for concatenation or it may use the dash notation to specify
416 one value range. Hence, to specify one printable character between
417 end-of-line sequences, the specification could be:
419 char-line = %x0D.0A %x20-7E %x0D.0A
4213.5. Sequence Group: (Rule1 Rule2)
423 Elements enclosed in parentheses are treated as a single element,
424 whose contents are strictly ordered. Thus,
426 elem (foo / bar) blat
428 matches (elem foo blat) or (elem bar blat), and
432 matches (elem foo) or (bar blat).
436 It is strongly advised that grouping notation be used, rather than
437 relying on the proper reading of "bare" alternations, when
438 alternatives consist of multiple rule names or literals.
440 Hence, it is recommended that the following form be used:
442 (elem foo) / (bar blat)
444 It will avoid misinterpretation by casual readers.
450Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 8]
452RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
455 The sequence group notation is also used within free text to set off
456 an element sequence from the prose.
4583.6. Variable Repetition: *Rule
460 The operator "*" preceding an element indicates repetition. The full
465 where <a> and <b> are optional decimal values, indicating at least
466 <a> and at most <b> occurrences of the element.
468 Default values are 0 and infinity so that *<element> allows any
469 number, including zero; 1*<element> requires at least one;
470 3*3<element> allows exactly 3; and 1*2<element> allows one or two.
4723.7. Specific Repetition: nRule
482 That is, exactly <n> occurrences of <element>. Thus, 2DIGIT is a
483 2-digit number, and 3ALPHA is a string of three alphabetic
4863.8. Optional Sequence: [RULE]
488 Square brackets enclose an optional element sequence:
4963.9. Comment: ; Comment
498 A semicolon starts a comment that continues to the end of line. This
499 is a simple way of including useful notes in parallel with the
506Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 9]
508RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
5113.10. Operator Precedence
513 The various mechanisms described above have the following precedence,
514 from highest (binding tightest) at the top, to lowest (loosest) at
517 Rule name, prose-val, Terminal value
531 Use of the alternative operator, freely mixed with concatenations,
534 Again, it is recommended that the grouping operator be used to
535 make explicit concatenation groups.
5374. ABNF Definition of ABNF
541 1. This syntax requires a formatting of rules that is relatively
542 strict. Hence, the version of a ruleset included in a
543 specification might need preprocessing to ensure that it can
544 be interpreted by an ABNF parser.
546 2. This syntax uses the rules provided in Appendix B.
549 rulelist = 1*( rule / (*c-wsp c-nl) )
551 rule = rulename defined-as elements c-nl
552 ; continues if next line starts
555 rulename = ALPHA *(ALPHA / DIGIT / "-")
562Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 10]
564RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
567 defined-as = *c-wsp ("=" / "=/") *c-wsp
568 ; basic rules definition and
569 ; incremental alternatives
571 elements = alternation *c-wsp
573 c-wsp = WSP / (c-nl WSP)
575 c-nl = comment / CRLF
578 comment = ";" *(WSP / VCHAR) CRLF
580 alternation = concatenation
581 *(*c-wsp "/" *c-wsp concatenation)
583 concatenation = repetition *(1*c-wsp repetition)
585 repetition = [repeat] element
587 repeat = 1*DIGIT / (*DIGIT "*" *DIGIT)
589 element = rulename / group / option /
590 char-val / num-val / prose-val
592 group = "(" *c-wsp alternation *c-wsp ")"
594 option = "[" *c-wsp alternation *c-wsp "]"
596 char-val = DQUOTE *(%x20-21 / %x23-7E) DQUOTE
597 ; quoted string of SP and VCHAR
600 num-val = "%" (bin-val / dec-val / hex-val)
603 [ 1*("." 1*BIT) / ("-" 1*BIT) ]
604 ; series of concatenated bit values
605 ; or single ONEOF range
607 dec-val = "d" 1*DIGIT
608 [ 1*("." 1*DIGIT) / ("-" 1*DIGIT) ]
610 hex-val = "x" 1*HEXDIG
611 [ 1*("." 1*HEXDIG) / ("-" 1*HEXDIG) ]
618Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 11]
620RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
623 prose-val = "<" *(%x20-3D / %x3F-7E) ">"
624 ; bracketed string of SP and VCHAR
626 ; prose description, to be used as
6295. Security Considerations
631 Security is truly believed to be irrelevant to this document.
6356.1. Normative References
637 [US-ASCII] American National Standards Institute, "Coded Character
638 Set -- 7-bit American Standard Code for Information
639 Interchange", ANSI X3.4, 1986.
6416.2. Informative References
643 [RFC733] Crocker, D., Vittal, J., Pogran, K., and D. Henderson,
644 "Standard for the format of ARPA network text messages",
645 RFC 733, November 1977.
647 [RFC822] Crocker, D., "Standard for the format of ARPA Internet
648 text messages", STD 11, RFC 822, August 1982.
674Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 12]
676RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
679Appendix A. Acknowledgements
681 The syntax for ABNF was originally specified in RFC 733. Ken L.
682 Harrenstien, of SRI International, was responsible for re-coding the
683 BNF into an Augmented BNF that makes the representation smaller and
684 easier to understand.
686 This recent project began as a simple effort to cull out the portion
687 of RFC 822 that has been repeatedly cited by non-email specification
688 writers, namely the description of Augmented BNF. Rather than simply
689 and blindly converting the existing text into a separate document,
690 the working group chose to give careful consideration to the
691 deficiencies, as well as benefits, of the existing specification and
692 related specifications made available over the last 15 years, and
693 therefore to pursue enhancement. This turned the project into
694 something rather more ambitious than was first intended.
695 Interestingly, the result is not massively different from that
696 original, although decisions, such as removing the list notation,
699 This "separated" version of the specification was part of the DRUMS
700 working group, with significant contributions from Jerome Abela,
701 Harald Alvestrand, Robert Elz, Roger Fajman, Aviva Garrett, Tom
702 Harsch, Dan Kohn, Bill McQuillan, Keith Moore, Chris Newman, Pete
703 Resnick, and Henning Schulzrinne.
705 Julian Reschke warrants a special thanks for converting the Draft
706 Standard version to XML source form.
708Appendix B. Core ABNF of ABNF
710 This appendix contains some basic rules that are in common use.
711 Basic rules are in uppercase. Note that these rules are only valid
712 for ABNF encoded in 7-bit ASCII or in characters sets that are a
713 superset of 7-bit ASCII.
717 Certain basic rules are in uppercase, such as SP, HTAB, CRLF, DIGIT,
720 ALPHA = %x41-5A / %x61-7A ; A-Z / a-z
725 ; any 7-bit US-ASCII character,
730Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 13]
732RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
739 ; Internet standard newline
750 HEXDIG = DIGIT / "A" / "B" / "C" / "D" / "E" / "F"
758 LWSP = *(WSP / CRLF WSP)
759 ; Use of this linear-white-space rule
760 ; permits lines containing only white
761 ; space that are no longer legal in
762 ; mail headers and have caused
763 ; interoperability problems in other
765 ; Do not use when defining mail
766 ; headers and use with caution in
775 ; visible (printing) characters
786Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 14]
788RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
793 Externally, data are represented as "network virtual ASCII" (namely,
794 7-bit US-ASCII in an 8-bit field), with the high (8th) bit set to
795 zero. A string of values is in "network byte order", in which the
796 higher-valued bytes are represented on the left-hand side and are
797 sent over the network first.
801 Dave Crocker (editor)
802 Brandenburg InternetWorking
807 Phone: +1.408.246.8253
808 EMail: dcrocker@bbiw.net
818 EMail: paul.overell@thus.net
842Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 15]
844RFC 5234 ABNF January 2008
847Full Copyright Statement
849 Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
851 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
852 contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
853 retain all their rights.
855 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
856 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
857 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
858 THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
859 OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
860 THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
861 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
865 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
866 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
867 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
868 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
869 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
870 made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
871 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
872 found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
874 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
875 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
876 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
877 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
878 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
879 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
881 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
882 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
883 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
884 this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
898Crocker & Overell Standards Track [Page 16]