7Network Working Group P. Resnick
8Request for Comments: 4469 QUALCOMM Incorporated
9Updates: 3501, 3502 April 2006
10Category: Standards Track
13 Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) CATENATE Extension
17 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
18 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
19 improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
20 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
21 and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
25 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
29 The CATENATE extension to the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP)
30 extends the APPEND command to allow clients to create messages on the
31 IMAP server that may contain a combination of new data along with
32 parts of (or entire) messages already on the server. Using this
33 extension, the client can catenate parts of an already existing
34 message onto a new message without having to first download the data
35 and then upload it back to the server.
58Resnick Standards Track [Page 1]
60RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
65 The CATENATE extension to the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP)
66 [1] allows the client to create a message on the server that can
67 include the text of messages (or parts of messages) that already
68 exist on the server without having to FETCH them and APPEND them back
69 to the server. The CATENATE extension extends the APPEND command so
70 that, instead of a single message literal, the command can take as
71 arguments any combination of message literals (as described in IMAP
72 [1]) and message URLs (as described in the IMAP URL Scheme [2]
73 specification). The server takes all the pieces and catenates them
74 into the output message. The CATENATE extension can also coexist
75 with the MULTIAPPEND extension [3] to APPEND multiple messages in a
78 There are some obvious uses for the CATENATE extension. The
79 motivating use case was to provide a way for a resource-constrained
80 client to compose a message for subsequent submission that contains
81 data that already exists in that client's IMAP store. Because the
82 client does not have to download and re-upload potentially large
83 message parts, bandwidth and processing limitations do not have as
84 much impact. In addition, since the client can create a message in
85 its own IMAP store, the command also addresses the desire of the
86 client to archive a copy of a sent message without having to upload
87 the message twice. (Mechanisms for sending the message are outside
88 the scope of this document.)
90 The extended APPEND command can also be used to copy parts of a
91 message to another mailbox for archival purposes while getting rid of
92 undesired parts. In environments where server storage is limited, a
93 client could get rid of large message parts by copying over only the
94 necessary parts and then deleting the original message. The
95 mechanism could also be used to add data to a message (such as
96 prepending message header fields) or to include other data by making
97 a copy of the original and catenating the new data.
992. The CATENATE Capability
101 A server that supports this extension returns "CATENATE" as one of
102 the responses to the CAPABILITY command.
114Resnick Standards Track [Page 2]
116RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
121 Arguments: mailbox name
122 (The following can be repeated in the presence of the
123 MULTIAPPEND extension [3])
124 OPTIONAL flag parenthesized list
125 OPTIONAL date/time string
126 a single message literal or one or more message parts to
127 catenate, specified as:
130 message (or message part) URL
132 Responses: OPTIONAL NO responses: BADURL, TOOBIG
134 Result: OK - append completed
135 NO - append error: can't append to that mailbox, error
136 in flags or date/time or message text, or can't
138 BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid
140 The APPEND command concatenates all the message parts and appends
141 them as a new message to the end of the specified mailbox. The
142 parenthesized flag list and date/time string set the flags and the
143 internal date, respectively, as described in IMAP [1]. The
144 subsequent command parameters specify the message parts that are
145 appended sequentially to the output message.
147 If the original form of APPEND is used, a message literal follows the
148 optional flag list and date/time string, which is appended as
149 described in IMAP [1]. If the extended form is used, "CATENATE" and
150 a parenthesized list of message literals and message URLs follows,
151 each of which is appended to the new message. If a message literal
152 is specified (indicated by "TEXT"), the octets following the count
153 are appended. If a message URL is specified (indicated by "URL"),
154 the octets of the body part pointed to by that URL are appended, as
155 if the literal returned in a FETCH BODY response were put in place of
156 the message part specifier. The APPEND command does not cause the
157 \Seen flag to be set for any catenated body part. The APPEND command
158 does not change the selected mailbox.
160 In the extended APPEND command, the string following "URL" is an IMAP
161 URL [2] and is interpreted according to the rules of [2]. The
162 present document only describes the behavior of the command using
163 IMAP URLs that refer to specific messages or message parts on the
164 current IMAP server from the current authenticated IMAP session.
165 Because of that, only relative IMAP message or message part URLs
166 (i.e., those having no scheme or <iserver>) are used. The base URL
170Resnick Standards Track [Page 3]
172RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
175 for evaluating the relative URL is considered "imap://user@server/",
176 where "user" is the user name of the currently authenticated user and
177 "server" is the domain name of the current server. When in the
178 selected state, the base URL is considered
179 "imap://user@server/mailbox", where "mailbox" is the encoded name of
180 the currently selected mailbox. Additionally, since the APPEND
181 command is valid in the authenticated state of an IMAP session, no
182 further LOGIN or AUTHENTICATE command is performed for URLs specified
183 in the extended APPEND command.
185 Note: Use of an absolute IMAP URL or any URL that refers to
186 anything other than a message or message part from the current
187 authenticated IMAP session is outside the scope of this document
188 and would require an extension to this specification, and a server
189 implementing only this specification would return NO to such a
192 The client is responsible for making sure that the catenated message
193 is in the format of an Internet Message Format (RFC 2822) [4] or
194 Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (MIME) [5] message. In
195 particular, when a URL is catenated, the server copies octets,
196 unchanged, from the indicated message or message part to the
197 catenated message. It does no data conversion (e.g., MIME transfer
198 encodings) nor any verification that the data is appropriate for the
199 MIME part of the message into which it is inserted. The client is
200 also responsible for inserting appropriate MIME boundaries between
201 body parts, and writing MIME Content-Type and Content-Transfer-
202 Encoding lines as needed in the appropriate places.
204 Responses behave just as the original APPEND command described in
205 IMAP [1]. If the server implements the IMAP UIDPLUS extension [6],
206 it will also return an APPENDUID response code in the tagged OK
207 response. Two response codes are provided in Section 4 that can be
208 used in the tagged NO response if the APPEND command fails.
212 When a APPEND command fails, it may return a response code that
213 describes a reason for the failure.
217 The BADURL response code is returned if the APPEND fails to process
218 one of the specified URLs. Possible reasons for this are bad URL
219 syntax, unrecognized URL schema, invalid message UID, or invalid body
220 part. The BADURL response code contains the first URL specified as a
221 parameter to the APPEND command that has caused the operation to
226Resnick Standards Track [Page 4]
228RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
233 The TOOBIG response code is returned if the resulting message will
234 exceed the 4-GB IMAP message limit. This might happen, for example,
235 if the client specifies 3 URLs for 2-GB messages. Note that even if
236 the server doesn't return TOOBIG, it still has to be defensive
237 against misbehaving or malicious clients that try to construct a
238 message over the 4-GB limit. The server may also wish to return the
239 TOOBIG response code if the resulting message exceeds a server-
240 specific message size limit.
244 The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
245 Form (ABNF) [7] notation. Elements not defined here can be found in
246 the formal syntax of the ABNF [7], IMAP [1], and IMAP ABNF extensions
247 [8] specifications. Note that capability and resp-text-code are
248 extended from the IMAP [1] specification and append-data is extended
249 from the IMAP ABNF extensions [8] specification.
251 append-data =/ "CATENATE" SP "(" cat-part *(SP cat-part) ")"
253 cat-part = text-literal / url
255 text-literal = "TEXT" SP literal
257 url = "URL" SP astring
259 resp-text-code =/ toobig-response-code / badurl-response-code
261 toobig-response-code = "TOOBIG"
263 badurl-response-code = "BADURL" SP url-resp-text
265 url-resp-text = 1*(%x01-09 /
268 %x5D-FE) ; Any TEXT-CHAR except "]"
270 capability =/ "CATENATE"
272 The astring in the definition of url and the url-resp-text in the
273 definition of badurl-response-code each contain an imapurl as defined
282Resnick Standards Track [Page 5]
284RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
289 Thanks to the members of the LEMONADE working group for their input.
290 Special thanks to Alexey Melnikov for the examples.
2927. Security Considerations
294 The CATENATE extension does not raise any security considerations
295 that are not present for the base protocol or in the use of IMAP
296 URLs, and these issues are discussed in the IMAP [1] and IMAP URL [2]
2998. IANA Considerations
301 IMAP4 capabilities are registered by publishing a standards track or
302 IESG approved experimental RFC. The registry is currently located at
303 <http://www.iana.org/assignments/imap4-capabilities>. This document
304 defines the CATENATE IMAP capability. The IANA has added this
305 capability to the registry.
338Resnick Standards Track [Page 6]
340RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
345 Lines not starting with "C: " or "S: " are continuations of the
348 The original message in examples 1 and 2 below (UID = 20) has the
352 multipart/mixed MIME message with two body parts:
356 2. application/x-zip-compressed
358 Example 1: The following example demonstrates how a CATENATE client
359 can replace an attachment in a draft message, without the need to
360 download it to the client and upload it back.
362 C: A003 APPEND Drafts (\Seen \Draft $MDNSent) CATENATE
363 (URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=20/;section=HEADER"
365 S: + Ready for literal data
367 C: --------------030308070208000400050907
368 C: URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=20/;section=1.MIME"
369 URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=20/;section=1" TEXT {42}
370 S: + Ready for literal data
372 C: --------------030308070208000400050907
373 C: URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=30" TEXT {44}
374 S: + Ready for literal data
376 C: --------------030308070208000400050907--
378 S: A003 OK catenate append completed
394Resnick Standards Track [Page 7]
396RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
399 Example 2: The following example demonstrates how the CATENATE
400 extension can be used to replace edited text in a draft message, as
401 well as header fields for the top level message part (e.g., Subject
402 has changed). The previous version of the draft is marked as
403 \Deleted. Note that the server also supports the UIDPLUS extension,
404 so the APPENDUID response code is returned in the successful OK
405 response to the APPEND command.
407 C: A003 APPEND Drafts (\Seen \Draft $MDNSent) CATENATE (TEXT {738}
408 S: + Ready for literal data
409 C: Return-Path: <bar@example.org>
410 C: Received: from [127.0.0.2]
411 C: by rufus.example.org via TCP (internal) with ESMTPA;
412 C: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:57:07 +0000
413 C: Message-ID: <419399E1.6000505@example.org>
414 C: Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2004 16:57:05 +0000
415 C: From: Bob Ar <bar@example.org>
416 C: X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
418 C: To: foo@example.net
419 C: Subject: About our holiday trip
420 C: Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
421 C: boundary="------------030308070208000400050907"
423 C: --------------030308070208000400050907
424 C: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
425 C: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
427 C: Our travel agent has sent the updated schedule.
431 C: --------------030308070208000400050907
432 C: URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=20/;Section=2.MIME"
433 URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=20/;Section=2" TEXT {44}
434 S: + Ready for literal data
436 C: --------------030308070208000400050907--
438 S: A003 OK [APPENDUID 385759045 45] append Completed
439 C: A004 UID STORE 20 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted)
440 S: A004 OK STORE completed
450Resnick Standards Track [Page 8]
452RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
455 Example 3: The following example demonstrates how the CATENATE
456 extension can be used to strip attachments. Below, a PowerPoint
457 attachment was replaced by a small text part explaining that the
458 attachment was stripped.
460 C: A003 APPEND Drafts (\Seen \Draft $MDNSent) CATENATE
461 (URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=21/;section=HEADER"
463 S: + Ready for literal data
465 C: --------------030308070208000400050903
466 C: URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=21/;section=1.MIME"
467 URL "/Drafts;UIDVALIDITY=385759045/;UID=21/;section=1" TEXT {255}
468 S: + Ready for literal data
470 C: --------------030308070208000400050903
471 C: Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
472 C: Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
474 C: This body part contained a Power Point presentation that was
475 C: deleted upon your request.
476 C: --------------030308070208000400050903--
478 S: A003 OK append Completed
506Resnick Standards Track [Page 9]
508RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
511 Example 4: The following example demonstrates a failed APPEND
512 command. The server returns the BADURL response code to indicate
513 that one of the provided URLs is invalid. This example also
514 demonstrates how the CATENATE extension can be used to construct a
515 digest of several messages.
517 C: A003 APPEND Sent (\Seen $MDNSent) CATENATE (TEXT {541}
518 S: + Ready for literal data
519 C: Return-Path: <foo@example.org>
520 C: Received: from [127.0.0.2]
521 C: by rufus.example.org via TCP (internal) with ESMTPA;
522 C: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:57:07 +0000
523 C: Message-ID: <419399E1.6000505@example.org>
524 C: Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2004 16:57:05 +0000
525 C: From: Farren Oo <foo@example.org>
526 C: X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
528 C: To: bar@example.org
529 C: Subject: Digest of the mailing list for today
530 C: Content-Type: multipart/digest;
531 C: boundary="------------030308070208000400050904"
533 C: --------------030308070208000400050904
534 C: URL "/INBOX;UIDVALIDITY=785799047/;UID=11467" TEXT {42}
535 S: + Ready for literal data
537 C: --------------030308070208000400050904
538 C: URL "/INBOX;UIDVALIDITY=785799047/;UID=113330/;section=1.5.9"
540 S: + Ready for literal data
542 C: --------------030308070208000400050904
543 C: URL "/INBOX;UIDVALIDITY=785799047/;UID=11916" TEXT {44}
544 S: + Ready for literal data
546 C: --------------030308070208000400050904--
548 S: A003 NO [BADURL "/INBOX;UIDVALIDITY=785799047/;UID=113330;
549 section=1.5.9"] CATENATE append has failed, one message expunged
551 Note that the server could have validated the URLs as they were
552 received and therefore could have returned the tagged NO response
553 with BADURL response-code in place of any continuation request after
554 the URL was received.
562Resnick Standards Track [Page 10]
564RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
5679. Normative References
569 [1] Crispin, M., "INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1",
570 RFC 3501, March 2003.
572 [2] Newman, C., "IMAP URL Scheme", RFC 2192, September 1997.
574 [3] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) -
575 MULTIAPPEND Extension", RFC 3502, March 2003.
577 [4] Resnick, P., "Internet Message Format", RFC 2822, April 2001.
579 [5] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
580 Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies",
581 RFC 2045, November 1996.
583 [6] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - UIDPLUS
584 extension", RFC 4315, December 2005.
586 [7] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
587 Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005.
589 [8] Melnikov, A. and C. Daboo, "Collected Extensions to IMAP4 ABNF",
590 RFC 4466, April 2006.
618Resnick Standards Track [Page 11]
620RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
626 QUALCOMM Incorporated
628 San Diego, CA 92121-1714
631 Phone: +1 858 651 4478
632 EMail: presnick@qualcomm.com
633 URI: http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/
674Resnick Standards Track [Page 12]
676RFC 4469 IMAP CATENATE Extension April 2006
679Full Copyright Statement
681 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
683 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
684 contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
685 retain all their rights.
687 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
688 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
689 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
690 ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
691 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
692 INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
693 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
697 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
698 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
699 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
700 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
701 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
702 made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
703 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
704 found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
706 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
707 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
708 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
709 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
710 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
711 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
713 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
714 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
715 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
716 this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
721 Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
722 Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
730Resnick Standards Track [Page 13]